EUR-Lex - 31987D0154 - EN

EUR-Lex - 31987D0154 - EN Avis juridique important | 87/154/EEC: Commission Decision of 18 February 1987 approving derogations provided for by Greece and Italy from certain provisions of Council Directive 77/93/EEC in respect of seed potatoes originating in Canada (only the Greek and the Italian texts are authentic) Official Journal L 065 , 10/03/1987 P. 0012 - 0015

COMMISSION DECISION of 18 February 1987 approving derogations provided for by Greece and Italy from certain provisions of Council Directive 77/93/EEC in respect of seed potatoes originating in Canada (Only the Greek and the Italian texts are authentic) (87/154/EEC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Directive 77/93/EEC of 21 December 1976 on protective measures against the introduction into the Member States of organisms harmful to plants or plant products (1), as last amended by Directive 86/651/EEC (2), and in particular Article 14 (2) and Annex IV, part A (24) thereof, Whereas, pursuant to Directive 77/93/EEC, potato tubers originating in the American continent may not, in principle, be brought into the Community unless their faculty of germination has been suppressed, in view of the risk of the introduction of potato spindle tuber viroid, and unless - if they originate in a country where Corynebacterium sepedonicum is know to occur - provisions recognized as equivalent to the Community provisions on combating this harmful organism have been complied with in the country of origin; Whereas, nevertheless, Article 14 (1) (c) (iii) of the abovementioned Directive permits Member States to provide for derogations with regard to the rule relating to the suppression of the faculty of germination, provided that there is no risk of harmful organisms spreading; whereas these derogations are subject to approval, under certain conditions, in accordance with Article 14 (2) and must also comply with the conditions laid down in Annex IV part A (24); Whereas in Greece and Italy the growing of potatoes of certain North American varieties has been an established practice; whereas part of the supply of seed potatoes of these varieties has been ensured by imports from Canada; Whereas, by Decision 86/120/EEC (3), the Commission approved derogations based on the concept of 'areal freedom' and subject to certain technical conditions to prevent the risk of harmful organisms spreading; whereas that approval expired on 31 March 1986; whereas the Commission also laid down that these derogations would provide for the oppostunity to seek confirmation of the proper functioning of the concept of 'areal freedom'; Whereas Greece and Italy have stated that they intend to provide for derogations for the current and subsequent seed-potato marketing seasons; Whereas it is known that Canada is still not free from potato spindle tuber viroid or from Corynebacterium sepedonicum; Whereas Canada has further developed its programme to eradicate these harmful organisms in the provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island; whereas there are good reasons to believe that the programme to eradicate potato spindle tuber viroid has become fully effective in those provinces, and that the programme to eridicate Corynebacterim sepedonicum has become fully effective in certain areas of these provinces; whereas, in particular, the sources of infection found on certain samples drawn from seed potatoes imported pursuant to Decision 86/120/EEC could not be identified; whereas it has at present not been established that there are sufficient elements which would militate against the proper functioning of the aforementioned concept of 'areal freedom' and therefore against the recognition of the provisions implemented there as equivalent to the Community provisions on combating Corynebacterium sepedonicum;

Whereas it can therefore be established that there is no risk of the harmful organisms in question spreading, provided that the seed potatoes originate in areas declared, on scientific evidence, free from both potato spindle tuber viroid and from Corynebacterium sepedonicum, and that certain improved special technical conditions are complied with; Whereas, therefore, the derogations provided for by Greece and Italy should be approved for the current seed-potato marketing season, provided that they include the aforementioned conditions and without prejudice to Council Directive 66/403/EEC (1), as last amended by Directive 86/215/EEC (2), and to Council Directive 70/457/EEC (3), as last amended by Directive 86/155/EEC (4); Whereas these derogations would provide for the opportunity to seek a more solid confirmation of the proper functioning of the concept of 'areal freedom', in particular through an increase in the number and size of samples to be tested as an additional safeguard; Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. Approval is hereby given, under the conditions laid down in paragraph 2, and without prejudice to Directives 66/403/EEC and 70/457/EEC, to Greece and Italy to provide, in accordance with Article 14 (1) (c) (iii) of Directive 77/93/EEC, and in connection with the third indent of part A (24) of Annex IV thereto, for derogations from Article 5 (1) and the third indent of Article 12 (1) (a) of that Directive as regards the requirements referred to in part A (25) of Annex IV, in respect of seed potatoes of the varieties Kennebec and Sebago originating in Canada.
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the following conditions shall apply: (a) The seed potatoes shall have been produced in fields located in areas of New Brunswick or Prince Edward Island which have been officially declared, by 'Argriculture Canada', free from both potato spindle tuber viroid and from Corynebacterium sepedonicum and which satisfy the following conditions, irrespective of whether the fields are operated by premises inside or outside the area: (i) the areas comprise at least

• either the fields owned by least three distinct potato-growing establishments, whether or whether not these establishments operate rented land located outside,
• or alternatively a surface of at least four square kilometres, and are surrounded entirely by water, or by land other than that of fields where the organisms concerned have occurred within the previous three years, and (ii) all potatoes produced in the area are the first direct progeny of seed potatoes of the category 'Pre-elite', 'Elite I', 'Elite II' or 'Elite III' which were produced in establishment qualified to produce seed potatoes of the 'Pre-elite' or 'Elite I' categories and which are either official establishment or officially designated and controlled for that purpose, and (iii) the surface used for the production of potatoes which are not finally certified as seed potatoes does not exceed one fifth of that used for the production of potatoes certified as seed potatoes, and (iv) systematic and representative annual surveys which have been carried out over at least the previous five years under appropriate conditions for the detection of the organisms concerned, on all potato fields located in the area and on potatoes harvested there, including appropriate laboratory testing, did not show any positive finding, or any other element which could militate against the recognition as disease-free, and (v) legislative, administrative or other arrangements have been made to ensure that:
• no potatoes originating in areas of Canada other than those declared disease-free, or in countries where the organisms concerned are known to occur, can be introduced into such areas, and
• neither potatoes originating in such areas nor any containers, packaging material, vehicles and handling, grading and preparation equipment used there can be brought into contact with potatoes originating, or material as specified used, in areas other than those declared disease-free;

this provision also applies to cases where fields located inside the areas declared disease-free are operated by premises outside such areas or where premises inside such areas operate fields located outside them; (vi) 'Agriculture Canada' shall provide the Commission with a complete list of the areas declared disease-free, supported by a map of each province concerned, showing through appropriate marks the geographical distribution of the areas. (b) The seed potatoes shall be certified officially as seed potatoes meeting at least the conditions laid down for the 'Foundation' category. (c) Samples shall be taken officially in respect of each consignment intended for Greece or Italy; a consignment may consist only of tubers of one single variety which have been produced on one single establishment; the samples shall be examined by official laboratories in order to detect any presence of potato spindle tuber viroid or Corynebacterium sepedonicum; the samples for the detection of potato spindle tuber viroid shall be tubers, or leaves taken from the crop to produce the consignment; for the detection of Corynebacterium sepedonicum, two samples of tubers shall be taken per consignment, each of which shall be approximately 1 % of the tubers in the consignment, up to 1 000 tubers; the examinations shall be carried out on the entire samples, using the following methods:

• as regards potato spindle tuber viroid: the Page method, after passage of the material through appropriate plants, or c-DNA hybridization procedure, and
• as regards Corynebacterium sepedonicum: at least the Angers IF method or an equvalent IF method. (d) The plant health certificate required shall be made out seperately for each consignment and only if it has been established by the scientists involved that the examinations referred to in (c) did not give rise to suspicions or to the detection of the presence of potato spindle tuber viroid or Corynebacterium sepedonicum in the consignment, and that in particular the IF-testing was shown to be negative. It shall state, under 'Additional Declaration', that the conditions laid down in (a) to (c) have been complied with, and shall give the name of the area as referred to in (a) and of the establishment referred to in a (iii), the consignments shall be kept separate in all operations including transport. (e) In Greece or Italy, a representative sample shall be taken officially from each of the consignments imported pursuant to this Decision, for official examination in respect of Corynebacterium sepedonicum; the consignments shall remain separate under official control and may not be marketed or used until it has been established that the presence of Corynebacterium sepedonicum was not suspected or detected in those examinations; sub-samples shall be kept available for subsequent examination by other Member States, and the Greek and Italian authorities respectively shall in due course inform the Commission, with a view to organizing that examination and the recording thereof; the total of consignments imported shall not exceed an amount which is adequate for the abovementioned examinations, taking into account the facilities available for that purpose.

Article 2 Greece and Italy shall provide the Commission and the other Member States, before 1 June 1987, with information on the amounts imported pursuant to this Decision and with a detailed technical report of the official examination referred to in Article 1 (2) (e); copies of each plant health certificate shall be transmitted to the Commission. Article 3 The approval granted in Article 1 shall expire on 31 March 1987. It shall be revoked prior to that date if it is found that the conditions laid down in Article 1 (2) have been insufficient to prevent the introduction of the harmful organisms in question or have not been complied with. It may be revoked prior to that date if it is found that there are elements which would militate against the prior functioning of the 'areal freedom' concept in Canada.

Article 4 This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic and to the Italian Republic. Done at Brussels, 18 February 1987. For the Commission Frans ANDRIESSEN Vice-President (1) OJ No L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 20. (2) OJ No L 382, 31. 12. 1986, p. 13. (3) OJ No L 99, 15. 4. 1986, p. 31. (1) OJ No 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2320/66. (2) OJ No L 152, 6. 6. 1986, p. 46. (3) OJ No L 225, 12. 10. 1970, p. 1. (4) OJ No L 118, 7. 5. 1986, p. 23.