Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/1162of 5 June 2025amending Commission Decision 2005/381/EC as regards the questionnaire for reporting on the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(notified under document C(2025) 3697)(Text with EEA relevance)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/1162 of 5 June 2025 amending Commission Decision 2005/381/EC as regards the questionnaire for reporting on the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2025) 3697) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/87/oj. , and in particular Article 21(1) thereof, Whereas: (1) Article 21(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC requires Member States to submit annual reports to the Commission on the application of that Directive. (2) Commission Decision 2005/381/EC Commission Decision 2005/381/EC of 4 May 2005 establishing a questionnaire for reporting on the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 43, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2005/381/oj). sets out in the Annex thereto a questionnaire to be used by Member States for the drawing up of annual reports to establish a detailed account of the application of Directive 2003/87/EC. (3) Directive (EU) 2023/959 of the European Parliament and of the Council Directive (EU) 2023/959 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading system (OJ L 130, 16.5.2023, p. 134, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/959/oj). amended Directive 2003/87/EC to align its provisions with the Union’s legally binding climate objectives, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj). . (4) To implement those amendments to Directive 2003/87/EC, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 of 19 December 2018 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 (OJ L 334, 31.12.2018, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2018/2066/oj). was amended to incorporate new rules on: monitoring and reporting emissions from extended activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC; emissions from renewable and low carbon fuels; CO2 quantities permanently chemically bound in products listed in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2620

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2620 of 30 July 2024 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the requirements for considering that greenhouse gases have become permanently chemically bound in a product (OJ L, 2024/2620, 4.10.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/2620/oj). ; and non-CO2 aviation effects. Furthermore, a new Chapter VIIa was included to implement a monitoring and reporting system for the emission trading scheme for buildings, road transport and additional sectors listed in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC. To align with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and further strengthen the verification and accreditation system, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 of 19 December 2018 on the verification of data and on the accreditation of verifiers pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 334, 31.12.2018, p. 94, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2018/2067/oj). was amended. Moreover, the rules for the free allocation of emission allowances were updated by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/873 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/873 of 30 January 2024 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 as regards transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances (OJ L, 2024/873, 4.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/873/oj). and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/772 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/772 of 16 April 2025 amending and correcting Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards further arrangements for the adjustments to free allocation of emission allowances due to activity level changes (OJ L, 2025/772, 22.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/772/oj). (5) Directive (EU) 2023/959 extended the scope of the European Emissions Trading System to international maritime transport activities. As a result, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 55, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/757/oj). was amended to further support the monitoring and reporting of emissions from shipping companies carrying out maritime transport activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917 of 20 October 2023 on the verification activities, accreditation of verifiers and approval of monitoring plans by administering authorities pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport, and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2072, (OJ L, 2023/2917, 29.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2917/oj).

, laid down harmonised requirements on the verifier’s assessment of monitoring plans and the verification of shipping company’s emission reports. (6) It is therefore necessary to reflect in Decision 2005/381/EC the amendments to Directive 2003/87/EC and to the related implementing and delegated acts. Moreover, further experience gained by Member States and the Commission in using the questionnaire has shown the need to improve the efficiency of the reporting and the coherence of the information reported. (7) To reduce the administrative burden of Member States in complying with Article 21(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC, the questions in the questionnaire should only concern those data that are not available to the Commission through other sources. For that reason, the questionnaire set out in Annex to Decision 2005/381/EC should not contain national implementation measures pursuant to Article 11 of Directive 2003/87/EC or Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 of 31 October 2019 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards further arrangements for the adjustments to free allocation of emission allowances due to activity level changes (OJ L 282, 4.11.2019, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/1842/oj). . Furthermore, the questionnaire should not cover data related to maritime transport activities that can be collected from Thetis MRV, the automated Union information system operated by the European Maritime Safety Agency, established for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2015/757 and Directive 2003/87/EC. (8) Decision 2005/381/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. (9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Climate Change Committee, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 2005/381/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

The Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 5 June 2025. For the Commission Wopke Hoekstra Member of the Commission

Annex

ANNEX .

Annex

ANNEX QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECTIVE 2003/87/EC

1. Details of institution submitting the report Name and department of organisation:Name of contact point:Job title of contact point:Address:International telephone number:E-mail:
2. Responsible authorities in the emissions trading system (EU ETS) and coordination between authorities 2.1. In the table below, please state the name, abbreviation and contact details of the following competent authorities: competent authorities involved in the implementation of the EU ETS for installations and aviation If the competent authority for CORSIA is different from the competent authority for EU ETS aviation, please give the name, abbreviation and contact details of that competent authority as well. in your Member State; competent authorities involved in the implementation of the emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors for regulated entities in your Member State;

administering authorities involved in the implementation of the EU ETS for maritime transport activities. Add further rows, if necessary. Please select from the drop-down menu: central competent authority, regional competent authority, local competent authority, other. If the competent authority is a central competent authority, the number of competent authorities does not have to be completed. Please specify the number of competent authorities in the case regional or local competent authorities are selected in the left column. Please provide the telephone number, email address and website address. NameAbbreviationType of competent authorityNumber of regional or local authoritiesContact details Are you using the national accreditation body appointed pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/765/oj). to accredit verifiers that are carrying out verification of emission reports, non-CO2 aviation effects reports, baseline data reports, new entrant data reports or annual activity level reports? Yes/No If yes, please state the name, abbreviation and contact details of that national accreditation body. Please provide the telephone number, email address and website address. NameAbbreviationContact details Have you set up a national certification authority to certify verifiers pursuant to Article 55(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 of 19 December 2018 on the verification of data and on the accreditation of verifiers pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 334, 31.12.2018, p. 94, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2018/2067/oj). ? Yes/No If yes, please state the name, abbreviation and contact details of the national certification authority using the table below. Please provide the telephone number, email address and website address. NameAbbreviationContact details In the table below, please state the name, abbreviation and contact details of the registry administrator in your Member State. Please provide the telephone number, email address and website address. NameAbbreviationContact details 2.2. In the table below, please indicate which competent authority is responsible for the following tasks, using their abbreviation. Add further rows, if necessary. Please note that if a box in the table below is grey, the task is not relevant for either installations, aviation, ETS2 or maritime transport activities. Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/87/oj).

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 of 19 December 2018 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 59, 27.2.2019, p. 8, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/331/oj). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 of 31 October 2019 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards further arrangements for the adjustments to free allocation of emission allowances due to activity level changes (OJ L 282, 4.11.2019, p. 20, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/1842/oj). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2830 of 17 October 2023 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by laying down rules on the timing, administration and other aspects of auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances (OJ L, 2023/2830, 20.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2830/oj). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 of 19 December 2018 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 (OJ L 334, 31.12.2018, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2018/2066/oj). This box needs to be completed only if the Member State has included activities or gases under Article 24 of Directive 2003/87/EC. This box needs to be completed only if the Member State has unilaterally included activities other than those listed in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC in the emission trading system for buildings, transport and additional activities in accordance with Article 30j of Directive 2003/87/EC. This box needs to be completed only if the Member State has excluded installations under Articles 27 and 27a of Directive 2003/87/EC. Competent authority in charge of:InstallationsETS2AviationMaritime transportIssuance of permitsApproval of the monitoring methodology plan for installations and significant changes to that planProcessing the applications for free allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331Assessing climate-neutrality plansAssessing climate-neutrality reportsAssessing annual activity level reports and adjustment of allowances under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 Free allocation pursuant to Article 3c of Directive 2003/87/ECActivities related to auctioning (the auctioneer as defined in Article 3, point (20), of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2830)Issuance of allowancesApproval of the monitoring plan and significant changes to the monitoring planReceiving and assessing verified annual emission reports or maritime emission reports and verification reportsApproval of improvement reports in accordance with Article 69 or 75q of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Inspection and enforcementAdministration of unilateral inclusion of activities and gases under Article 24 of Directive 2003/87/ECAdministration of unilateral inclusion of activities other than listed in Annex III of Directive 2003/87/EC (Article 30j of Directive 2003/87/EC)Administration of installations excluded under Articles 27 and 27a of Directive 2003/87/ECOther, please specify:

2.3. If more than one competent authority is designated in your Member State pursuant to Article 18 of Directive 2003/87/EC, which competent authority is your focal point as referred to in Article 70(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 or your focal point as referred to in Article 64(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917 of 20 October 2023 on the verification activities, accreditation of verifiers and approval of monitoring plans by administering authorities pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport, and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2072 (OJ L, 2023/2917, 29.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2917/oj). ? Please answer using the relevant abbreviation in the table below. Name of the competent authority that is the focal point as referred to in Article 70(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 or Article 64(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917Abbreviation If more than one competent authority is designated in your Member State to carry out the activities as referred to in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, what measures have been taken to coordinate the work of those competent authorities in accordance with Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please answer using the table below. Add further rows, if necessary. Coordination activities for the management of the emissions trading system covered by Chapter II and III of Directive 2003/87/EC. Coordination activities for the management of the emissions trading system covered by Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC. Coordination of activities with respect to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 ETS1 Yes/No ETS2 Yes/No Comments (optional)Does a central competent authority review monitoring plans, annual emission reports and improvement reports in addition to local and regional authorities on a regular basis?Does a central competent authority provide advice or instructions to local and/or regional competent authorities?Is the advice or are the instructions binding?Are regular meetings organised between competent authorities?Is common training organised for all competent authorities to ensure harmonised implementation of requirements?Is a structured working or coordination group established where competent authority staff discusses monitoring and reporting issues and develops common approaches?Are there other coordination activities? If yes, please specify: 2.4. What information exchange is organised between competent authorities? information exchange between competent authorities responsible for stationary installations and aircraft operators, information exchange between competent authorities in accordance with Article 75r(3), Article 75v(1) and Article 75w(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, information exchange between national authorities in accordance with Article 20(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 55, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/757/oj). . Please select: ETS1 for stationary installations, ETS1 for aviation, ETS2 or ETS Maritime. Please use the abbreviations of the competent authorities referred to in question 2.1. If information is shared with authorities that are not listed under question 2.1, please provide a general indication of what these authorities are (e.g. tax authorities pursuant to Directives 2003/96/EC and (EU) 2020/262, authorities under the Industrial Emissions Directive). Please specify in general terms what type of information is shared and in what manner (e.g. regular meetings, ad-hoc meetings, working groups, electronic IT system, mandatory requirement to share information through the competent authority). Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 51, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/96/oj). Council Directive (EU) 2020/262 of 19 December 2019 laying down the general arrangements for excise duty (OJ L 58, 27.2.2020, p. 4, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2020/262/oj). Information exchange between competent authoritiesScopeCompetent authorities involvedType of information exchange measures implementedInformation exchange on approval of monitoring plansInformation exchange on assessment of emission reportsInformation exchange on compliance and enforcementInformation exchange to facilitate the determination of end use of fuel released for consumption in accordance with Article 75v(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Information exchange with authorities charged with supervision pursuant to national legislation transposing Council Directive 2003/96/EC and Council Directive (EU) 2020/262Other Has your Member State required operators or aircraft operators to make the relevant information listed in Annex Xa to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 available to the regulated entity concerned earlier than 31 March of the reporting year? Yes/No 2.5. What effective exchange of information and cooperation has been established in accordance with Article 70(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 and Article 64(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917 between the national accreditation body or, if relevant, the national certification authority and the competent authority within your Member State? Please answer using the table below. Add further rows, if necessary. Coordination of activities with respect to Article 70(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 or Article 64(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917Yes/NoComments (optional)Are periodic meetings organised between the national accreditation body/national certification authority (if relevant) and the competent authority responsible for the coordination?Has a working group been established where the national accreditation body/national certification authority (if relevant), the competent authority and verifiers discuss accreditation and verification issues?Can the competent authority accompany the national accreditation body in accreditation activities as an observer?Are there other coordination activities? If yes, please specify:

1. Coverage of activities, installations, aircraft operators and regulated entities 3.A. Installations 3.1. How many installations carry out activities and emit greenhouse gas emissions listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC? How many of those installations are category A, B and C installations as referred to in Article 19(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? How many of the category A installations are installations with low emissions as referred to in Article 47(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please answer using the table below. InstallationsNumberTotal number of installationsCategory A installationsCategory B installationsCategory C installationsHow many of the category A installations are installations with low emissions? Which Annex I activities are carried out by installations in your Member State? Please answer using the table below. Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (OJ L 140 5.6.2009, p. 114, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/31/oj). Annex I activityYes/NoCombustion activities as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECCombustion of fuels in installations for the incineration of municipal wasteRefining of oilProduction of cokeMetal ore (including sulphide ore) roasting or sintering, including pelletisationProduction of iron or steel as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction or processing of ferrous metals as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of primary aluminium or alumina Production of secondary aluminium as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction or processing of non-ferrous metals as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of cement clinker in rotary kilns as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of lime or calcination of dolomite or magnesite as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECManufacture of glass as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECManufacture of ceramic products as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECManufacture of mineral wool insulation material using glass, rock or slag as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECDrying or calcination of gypsum or production of plaster boards and other gypsum products, as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of pulp as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of paper or cardboard as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of carbon black as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of nitric acidProduction of adipic acidProduction of glyoxal and glyoxylic acidProduction of ammoniaProduction of bulk organic chemicals as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of hydrogen (H2) and synthesis gas as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECProduction of soda ash (Na2CO3) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECCapture of greenhouse gases from installations as specified in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECTransport of greenhouse gases for geological storage in a storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the CouncilGeological storage of greenhouse gases in a storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC

3.2. Have you excluded installations under Article 27 or 27a of Directive 2003/87/EC? Yes/No If yes, please complete in the table below: the total number of installations and their emissions excluded under Article 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC and the number of installations that have exceeded the threshold of 25000 tonnes of CO2(e) under Article 27 of that Directive and that need to re-enter the emissions trading system, the total number of installations and their emissions excluded under Article 27a(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC and the number of installations that have exceeded the threshold of 2500 tonnes of CO2(e) under Article 27a(1) of that Directive and that need to re-enter the emissions trading system, the total emissions of units excluded under Article 27a(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC and the number of units that exceeded the threshold of 300 hours under Article 27a(3) of that Directive and that need to re-enter the emissions trading system, the number of installations excluded under Articles 27 and 27a of Directive 2003/87/EC that have been closed in the reporting period. Exclusion under Article 27, Article 27a(1) or Article 27a(3) of Directive 2003/87/ECNumber of installations excluded under Article 27 or Article 27a(1) of Directive 2003/87/ECTotal emissions of installations excluded under Article 27, Article 27a(1) or Article 27a(3) of Directive 2003/87/ECNumber of installations or units that exceeded the applicable thresholds that need to re-enter the emissions trading systemNumber of installations under Article 27 and Article 27a that are closedArticle 27Article 27a(1)Article 27a(3) 3.B. Aircraft operators 3.3. How many aircraft operators are carrying out activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC for which you are responsible as administering Member State? How many of those aircraft operators are commercial aircraft operators and non-commercial aircraft operators? How many of the total number of aircraft operators are small emitters as referred to in Article 55(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please specify using the table below. Type of aircraft operatorsNumber of commercial aircraft operatorsNumber of non-commercial aircraft operatorsTotal numberAircraft operators that are not small emittersAircraft operators that are small emittersTotal number How many of the total number of aircraft operators that are carrying out activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC have to monitor and report flights falling under CORSIA? How many aircraft operators have ceased operations and no longer carry out activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC in the reporting period? Please specify using the table below. Number of aircraft operatorsAircraft operators subject to CORSIA monitoring and reporting obligationsAircraft operators that have ceased carrying out activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 3.C. Regulated entities 3.4. How many regulated entities release fuels for consumption in the activities listed in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC or activities unilaterally included in accordance with Article 30j of that Directive? How many of those regulated entities are category A and B regulated entities as referred to in Article 75e of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? How many of the category A regulated entities are regulated entities with low emissions as referred to in Article 75n(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please answer using the table below.

Regulated entitiesNumberTotal number of regulated entitiesCategory A regulated entitiesCategory B regulated entitiesHow many of the category A regulated entities are regulated entities with low emissions? 4. The issue of permits for installations 4.1. Please specify in the table below to what extent there has been integration or coordination between Directive 2003/87/EC and Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (OJ L 334 17.12.2010, p. 17, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/75/oj). (the Industrial Emissions Directive). Integration and coordination of the greenhouse gas emission permit (ETS permit) and the Industrial Emissions Directive permitYes/No/PartiallyComments (optional)Is the ETS permit part of the Industrial Emissions Directive permit?If not, are the permitting procedures under the Industrial Emissions Directive and ETS permit integrated?If not, do Industrial Emissions Directive regulators check whether an ETS permit is applicable and, if necessary, inform the competent authority responsible for the activities under the EU ETS?Are the approval of monitoring plans and assessment of annual emission reports carried out by Industrial Emissions Directive regulators?Is inspection of the EU ETS activities carried out by Industrial Emissions Directive regulators?Are Industrial Emissions Directive regulators requested to provide advice or instructions on the monitoring, reporting and verification activities carried out by the competent authority under EU ETS?If yes, is that advice or are those instructions binding?Is the integration or coordination of permitting carried out in another way? If yes, please specify: 4.2. When does national law require a permit update in accordance with Articles 6 and 7 or Article 30b of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please provide details of the provisions in national law in the table below. Add further rows, if necessary. Please note that if a box in the table below is grey, the task is not relevant for ETS2. Category of changesDetails of provisions in national law on ETS1 permitsDetails of provisions in national law on ETS2 permitsWhen can permits be withdrawn by the competent authority?Does a permit expire under national law? If yes, under what circumstances?When is a permit changed as a result of an increase in capacity?When is a permit changed as a result of a decrease in capacity?When is a permit changed as a result of changes to the monitoring plan?Are there other types of permit updates? If yes, please provide details: What is the total number of permit updates in accordance with Articles 6, 7 and 30b of Directive 2003/87/EC that occurred in the reporting period? Please specify in the table below the number of permit updates as far as that is known to the competent authority. ETS1ETS2Total number of permits updated in the reporting period

1. Application of the monitoring and reporting rules 5.A. General 5.1. Is additional national legislation adopted to assist in the implementation of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or Regulation (EU) 2015/757? Yes/NoNational legislation to implement the emissions trading system for stationary installations or aircraft operatorsNational legislation to implement the emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors covered by Annex III to Directive 2003/87/ECNational legislation to implement the emissions trading system for maritime transport activities If yes, please specify below for which areas additional national legislation has been or is being implemented. Has additional national guidance been developed to support the understanding of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or Regulation (EU) 2015/757? Yes/NoNational guidance related to emissions trading system for stationary installations or aircraft operatorsNational guidance related to emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors covered by Annex III to Directive 2003/87/ECNational guidance related to emissions trading system for maritime transport activities If yes, please specify below for which areas additional national guidance has been developed. 5.2. What measures have been taken to streamline the EU ETS reporting requirements with reporting requirements of other existing reporting mechanisms such as greenhouse gas inventory reporting and reporting in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (OJ L 33, 4.2.2006, p. 1, http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2006/166/oj). ? Please complete the table below. Measures to streamline reporting requirementsYes/NoComments (optional)EU ETS data is used for compiling the GHG inventory reportEU ETS annual emission report is used by authorities responsible for GHG inventories and the statistical office to make comparisons with the national energy balanceEU ETS emission reporting is used by authorities responsible for compiling E-PRTR reports for plausibility and/or validation checksEU ETS data is used as validation and quality assurance in GHG inventory reportingAn online reporting portal or platform is in place to report for EU ETS, E-PRTR and/or other purposesThere is structured coordination between E-PRTR, GHG inventory and EU ETS competent authoritiesAre there other measures to streamline EU ETS reporting requirements with other reporting requirements? If yes, please specify: 5.3. Are you using the template developed by the Commission for monitoring plans, emission reports, verification reports and/or improvement report? Yes/No If no, please specify in the table below whether your Member State has developed customised electronic templates or specific file formats for monitoring plans, emission reports, verification reports and/or improvement reports and indicate which elements are different compared to the template developed by the Commission.

Please select Member State specific template or Member State specific file format. Member State specific template or file formatWhich elements differ from those of the templates and file formats published by the Commission?Monitoring plan for installationsEmission report for installationsVerification report for installationsImprovement report for installations Please select Member State specific template or Member State specific file format. Member State specific template or file formatWhich elements differ from those of the templates and file formats published by the Commission?Monitoring plan for aircraft operatorsEmission report for aircraft operatorsVerification report for aircraft operatorsImprovement report for aircraft operators Please select Member State specific template or Member State specific file format. Member State specific template or file formatWhich elements differ from those of the templates and file formats published by the Commission?Monitoring plan for regulated entitiesEmission report for regulated entitiesVerification report for regulated entitiesImprovement report for regulated entities Please select Member State specific template or Member State specific file format. Member State specific template or file formatWhich elements differ from those of the templates and file formats published by the Commission?Verification report for the verification of shipping company’s reports What measures have you implemented to comply with the requirements set out in Article 74(1) and (2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please specify below. 5.4. Are you using an automated system for electronic data exchange between operators or aircraft operators and the competent authority and other parties? Yes/No Are you using an automated system for electronic data exchange between regulated entities, the competent authority and other parties? Yes/No If yes, please specify below what provisions you have implemented to comply with the requirements set out in Article 75(1) and (2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066. 5.B. Installations 5.5. In the table below, please complete, for the fuels listed, the total fuel consumption and total annual emissions based on data reported in the operator’s emission reports for the reporting year. Please note that this question does not cover biomass (including non-sustainable biofuels, bioliquids, solid biomass, renewable fuels of non-biological origin, recycled carbon fuels or synthetic low carbon fuels). Information concerning combustion of biomass is covered by question 5.14. Fuel type descriptionTotal fuel consumption (TJ)Total annual emissions (t CO2)Hard coalLignite and sub-bituminous coalPeatCokeNatural gasCoke oven gasBlast furnace gasRefinery gas and other process derived gasesFuel oilLiquefied petroleum gasPetroleum cokeOther fossil fuels 5.6. In the table below, please complete the aggregate total emissions for each reported IPCC Common Reporting Format (CRF) category based on the data provided in the operator’s emission reports in accordance with Article 73 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066.

CRF Category 1 (Energy)CRF Category 2 (Process emissions)Total emissions (t CO2(e))Total combustion emissions (t CO2(e))Total process emissions (t CO2(e)) 5.7. In the table below, please indicate the number of installations for which the competent authority has allowed a different frequency for analysis in accordance with Article 35(2), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 as well as confirmation that the sampling plan in those cases is fully documented and adhered to. Name of fuel or materialNumber of installations for which the competent authority has allowed a different frequency for analysisNumber of major source streams for which a different frequency for analysis is applied Confirmation that the sampling plan is fully documented and adhered to Yes/No If no, please specify the reason 5.8. If the highest tier approaches for major source streams or major emission sources of category C installations as referred to in Article 19(2), point (c), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 are not applied, please indicate in the table below, for each installation for which that situation occurred, the affected source streams or emission source, the affected monitoring parameter, the highest tier required under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and the tier applied. Installation identification code recognised in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122 of 12 March 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the functioning of the Union Registry (OJ L 177, 2.7.2019, p. 3, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/1122/oj). Please select under affected monitoring parameter: quantity of fuel, quantity of material, net calorific value, emission factor, preliminary emission factor, oxidation factor, conversion factor, carbon content, biomass fraction, RFNBO/RCF fraction, SLCF fraction or in the case of a measurement-based methodology: the annual average hourly emissions in kg/h from the emission source. Installation identification codeAffected source stream in the calculation-based methodologyAffected emission source in the measurement-based methodologyAffected monitoring parameterHighest tier required under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Tier applied in practice 5.9. In the table below, please indicate the number of category B installations as referred to in Article 19(2), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 that do not apply the highest tier for all major source streams and all major emission sources Emission sources which emit more than 5000 tonnes of CO2(e) per year or which contribute more than 10 % of the total annual emissions of the installation, whichever is higher in terms of absolute emissions. in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066. Please select: calculation based methodology or measurement based methodology. Monitoring methodologyMain Annex I activityNumber of installations affected 5.10. Have installations in your Member State applied the fall-back approach in accordance with Article 22 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No

If yes, please complete the table below. Installation identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Please select: (a) applying tier 1 is technically unfeasible or leads to unreasonable costs for one major source stream; (b) applying tier 1 is technically unfeasible or leads to unreasonable costs for one minor source stream; (c) applying tier 1 is technically unfeasible or leads to unreasonable costs for more than one major or minor source stream; or (d) applying tier 1 in the measurement-based methodology is technically unfeasible or leads to unreasonable costs as referred to in Article 22 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066. Please select: quantity of fuel, quantity of material, net calorific value, emission factor, preliminary emission factor, oxidation factor, conversion factor, carbon content, biomass fraction, RFNBO/RCF fraction, SLCF fraction or, in the case of a measurement-based methodology, the annual average hourly emissions in kg/h from the emission source. Installation identification codeReason for applying the fall-back approachParameter, for which at least tier 1 was not reachedEstimated emissions affected by this parameter 5.11. Please indicate in the table below the number of category A, B and C installations that were required to submit and actually submitted an improvement report in accordance with Article 69 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066. The information in the table below concerns the submission of the improvement report. Please fill in the improvement reports submitted in the previous reporting period and, if applicable, add the number of improvement reports submitted for the current reporting period. Please select: improvement report in accordance with Article 69(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, improvement report in accordance with Article 69(3) of that Implementing Regulation or improvement report in accordance with Article 69(4) of that Implementing Regulation. Installation categoryMain Annex I activityYearType of improvement reportNumber of installations required to submit an improvement reportNumber of installations that submitted an improvement report in practice 5.12. Has inherent CO2 in accordance with Article 48, CO2 in accordance with Article 49, or N2O in accordance with Article 50 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 been transferred in your Member State? Yes/No Has CO2 in accordance with Article 49a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 been permanently chemically bound in a product listed in the Annex to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2620 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2620 of 30 July 2024 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the requirements for considering that greenhouse gases have become permanently chemically bound in a product (OJ L, 2024/2620, 4.10.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/2620/oj). ? If yes, please complete the table below.

Please select: transfer of inherent CO2 (Article 48), transfer of CO2 for the purpose of transport and long-term geological storage in a storage site (Article 49(1), CO2 permanently chemically bound in a product (Article 49a), transfer of N2O (Article 50). If CO2 has been permanently chemically bound in precipitated calcium carbonate, please fill only for the reporting year 2024, CO2 permanently chemically bound in the fifth column and specify in the sixth column that the CO2 was chemically bound in PCC. From 1 January 2025 onwards, it is no longer possible to subtract CO2 that is permanently chemically bound in PCC from the total emissions. Installation identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. The installation transferring the inherent CO2 under Article 48 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, the installation transferring CO2 under Article 49 of that Implementing Regulation, the installation transferring the N2O under Article 50 of that Implementing Regulation, the installation where CO2 is captured and permanently chemically bound in a product under Article 49a of that Implementing Regulation. If the party transferring the CO2 is a CO2 transport infrastructure, please state so. Please provide either the installation identification code of the installation receiving the inherent CO2, the installation identification code of the installations receiving CO2 pursuant to Article 49 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or receiving N2O pursuant to Article 50 of that Implementing Regulation. If the receiving party is a CO2 transport infrastructure or the installation is a storage site, please state so. If the receiving party is a non-EU ETS consumer, please fill in non-EU ETS consumer. Please provide the amount of inherent CO2 or CO2 transferred pursuant to Article 49 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066. Type of transferInstallation identification code of the transferring installation or the CO2 transport infrastructureInstallation identification code of the receiving installation or the CO2 transport infrastructureAmount of CO2 or N2O transferred(t CO2 or t N2O)Amount of CO2 permanently chemically bound in a product listed in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2620.Type of product listed in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2620.Emissions of inherent CO2 received (t CO2)Main Annex I activity of the receiving installation or CO2 transport infrastructure in the case of transfer of CO2 (Article 49) or transfer of N2O (Article 50)Permit number for the storage site (permit under Directive 2009/31/EC) in the case of transfer to the Carbon Capture Storage site 5.13. Did any installations in your Member State apply continuous emissions measurement in accordance with Article 40 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below, the total emissions of each installation, the emissions covered by continuous emission measurement, and whether the measured gas contains biomass CO2.

Installation identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Biomass fuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBO)/recycled carbon fuels (RCF), synthetic low carbon fuels (SLCF). Installation identification code of installations emitting CO2Installation identification code of installations emitting N2OTotal annual emissions (t CO2(e))Emissions covered by continuous measurement (t CO2(e))Does the measured flue gas contain biomass, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF? Yes/NoDoes the measured CO2 cover transfer of CO2 pursuant to Article 49 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No 5.14. In the table below, please indicate for each main activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC: the number of category A, B and C installations using bioliquids, biomass fuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBO)/recycled carbon fuels (RCF), synthetic low carbon fuels (SLCF), the total emissions from bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF, or SLCF which are considered zero-rated, i.e. where no sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply or where the sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are complied with, the total emissions from bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which are not considered zero-rated, i.e. where sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply but these criteria are not complied with, the total fossil emissions from installations using bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF, the energy content of the bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which is considered zero-rated, the energy content of the bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which is not considered zero-rated, and the fossil energy consumed by installations using bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF. Please select biomass fuel, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF. Main Annex I activityInstallation categoryType of renewable fuelNumber of category A, B and C installations using biomass, RFNBO/RCF or SLCFEmissions from biomass, RFNBO/ RCF or SLCF to which sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are applied and satisfied and emissions from biomass to which no sustainability criteria apply (t CO2(e))Emissions from biomass, RFNBO/ RCF, SLCF to which the sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply but were not satisfied (t CO2(e))Fossil emissions (t CO2(e))Energy content of zero-rated biomass, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF (TJ)Energy content of non-zero rated biomass, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF (TJ)Energy content of fossil fuels/materials (TJ) Which of the methods to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are in general applied in your Member State? Please use the table below providing the response. If national schemes are used to demonstrate such compliance, please describe the main elements. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/oj).

Method allowed to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas savings criteriaYes/NoDescription of main elements if national schemes are usedUnion DatabaseNational database linked with Union Database in accordance with Article 31a of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilVoluntary scheme recognised by the CommissionNational schemeOperator’s own evidence 5.15. What was the total quantity of fossil CO2 emissions from waste used as fuel or input material? Please answer by using the table below. Emissions (t CO2)Waste used by installations under Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 5.16. Has your Member State allowed the use of any simplified monitoring plans in accordance with Article 13(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No If yes, please specify in the table below what sort of risk assessment was carried out and on which principles it was configured. Please select: risk assessment carried out by the competent authority or risk assessment carried out by the operator. Type of risk assessmentGeneral principles of the risk assessment 5.C. Aircraft operators 5.17. What monitoring methods and tools are used by aircraft operators to determine emissions and non-CO2 aviation effects? Please answer using the tables below. Methods applied to determine the fuel consumption in order to determine the emissionsNumber of aircraft operators using this methodWhich number of aircraft operators in the second column are small emitters?Method A to determine the fuel consumption to determine CO2 emissionsMethod B to determine the fuel consumption to determine CO2 emissionsMethod A and B to determine the fuel consumption to determine CO2 emissions Methods applied to determine non-CO2 aviation effectsNumber of aircraft operators using this methodWhich number of aircraft operators in the second column are small emitters?Method C consisting of a weather-based approach to determine the non-CO2 aviation effectsMethod D consisting of location-based simplified approach to determine the non-CO2 aviation effectsOwn fuel-burn module as referred to in Article 56a(4), point (a), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 Tools to be applied in the monitoring of emissionsNumber of aircraft operatorsThe number of small emitters using the small emitters tool (SET) to determine their fuel consumption Number of aircraft operators below 25000 tonnes of CO2 or aircraft operators having total emissions of less than 3000 tonnes of CO2 whose emission report is generated from the EU ETS support facility independently from any input of the aircraft operatorNumber of aircraft operators using an alternative method to determine the emissions of missing flightsNumber of aircraft operators using the small emitters tool (SET) as referred to in Article 55(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 to determine the emissions of missing flights Tools to be applied in the monitoring of non-CO2 aviation effectsNumber of aircraft operatorsNumber of aircraft operators whose non-CO2 aviation effects report is generated from an IT tool approved by the Commission in accordance with Article 56a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, independently from any input from the aircraft operator.

5.18. In the table below, please specify the aggregate total emissions of all flights and domestic flights carried out in the reporting period by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State, the aggregate total emissions of CORSIA flights carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State, the aggregate total emissions subject to offsetting requirements under CORSIA from aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State, the aggregate total emissions of flights falling under the Swiss emission trading scheme carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State, the total CO2 equivalent concerning non-CO2 aviation effects of flights carried out in the reporting period by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State. Total emissions (t CO2 or t CO2(e)Total emissions of flights carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member StateTotal emissions of domestic flights carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member StateTotal emissions of CORSIA flights carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member StateTotal emissions subject to offset requirements under CORSIA carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State Total emissions from flights subject to the Swiss emission trading scheme carried out by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member StateTotal CO2 equivalent non-CO2 aviation effects of flights carried out in the reporting period by aircraft operators for which you are the administering Member State How many aircraft operators have reported non-CO2 aviation effects from flights between an aerodrome located in a third country and an aerodrome located in a Member State or between third countries? Please use the table below to answer the question. Total number of aircraft operators reporting related to extra-EU flights in the aircraft operator’s non-CO2 aviation effects reports 5.19. In the table below, please indicate: the number of aircraft operators that reported using alternative fuels consisting of biofuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF, the total emissions from biofuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which are considered zero-rated, i.e. where the sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are complied with, and the total emissions from biofuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which are not considered zero-rated, i.e. where sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply but these criteria are not complied with. Please specify biofuel, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF. Type of alternative fuelNumber of aircraft operators that reported using alternative fuels (per type)Emissions from biofuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF to which sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are applied and which satisfied such criteria (t CO2)Emissions from biofuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF to which the sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply but were not satisfied (t CO2)

Which of the methods to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are in general applied in your Member State? Please use the table below providing the response. If national schemes are used to demonstrate such compliance, please describe the main elements. Method allowed by competent authority to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas savings criteriaYes/NoDescription of main elements if national schemes are usedUnion DatabaseNational database linked with Union Database in accordance with Article 31a of Directive (EU) 2018/2001Voluntary scheme recognised by the CommissionNational schemeOperator’s own evidence 5.20. In the table below, please indicate the number of aircraft operators that were required to submit and actually submitted an improvement report in accordance with Article 69 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066. The information requested in the table below concerns the submission of improvement reports. Please indicate whether the improvement concerns the monitoring of CO2 emissions or the monitoring of non-CO2 aviation effects. Please fill in the improvement reports submitted in the previous reporting period and if applicable, add the number of improvement reports submitted in the current reporting period. Type of monitoringYearNumber of aircraft operators required to submit an improvement reportNumber of aircraft operators that submitted an improvement report in practice 5.21. Has your Member State allowed the use of any simplified monitoring plans in accordance with Article 13(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No If yes, please specify in the table below what type of risk assessment was carried out and on which principles it was configured. Please select: risk assessment carried out by the competent authority or risk assessment carried out by the aircraft operator. Type of risk assessmentGeneral principles of risk assessment 5.D. Regulated entities 5.22. If the highest tier approaches for major fuel streams that are released for consumption by category B regulated entities as referred to in Article 75e(2), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 are not applied, please indicate in the table below, for each regulated entity for which that situation occurred, the affected fuels released for consumption, the affected monitoring parameter, the highest tier required under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and the tier applied. Regulated entity code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Please select under affected monitoring parameter: quantity of fuel, net calorific value, emission factor, preliminary emission factor, unit conversion factor, biomass fraction, RFNBO/RCF fraction or SLCF fraction, the scope factor. Regulated entity identification codeAffected fuel released for consumptionAffected monitoring parameterHighest tier required under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Tier applied in practice

5.23. In the table below, please indicate the number of category A regulated entities as referred to in Article 75e(2), point (a), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 that do not apply the highest tier for major fuel streams released for consumption in accordance with that Implementing Regulation. Number of regulated entitiesCategory A regulated entities not meeting the highest tier in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 5.24. What scope factor methods as referred to in Article 75l(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 were used in your Member State? If possible, please specify by fuels and by sectors. Does the competent authority require scope factor method as referred to in Article 75l(6) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No If the European Commission has approved the use of a default value in accordance with Article 75l(6) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 for certain fuel streams, please answer No to this question (this question only concerns the case where Member States require the regulated entities to use a specific method as referred to in Article 75l(2)). If yes, please specify in general terms which scope factor method is required and for which sector Please use the CRF category number to specify the sector. . What is the number of regulated entities and the aggregated emissions of fuel streams for which those regulated entities applied a default value of 1 in accordance with Article 75l(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 because it is technically not feasible or would lead to unreasonable costs to apply the scope factor methods as referred to in Article 75l(2) of that Implementing Regulation? Please specify in the table below Number of regulated entities applying a default value of 1 in accordance with Article 75l(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Total aggregated emissions of regulated entities applying a default value of 1 in accordance with Article 75l(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 5.25. In the table below, please indicate: the number of category A and B regulated entities releasing biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBO)/recycled carbon fuels (RCF), synthetic low carbon fuels (SLCF) for consumption, the total emissions from biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which are considered zero-rated, i.e. where no sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply or where the sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are complied with, the total emissions from biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which are not considered zero-rated, i.e. where sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply but these criteria are not complied with, the total fossil emissions from regulated entities releasing biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF for consumption, the energy content of the biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which is considered zero-rated,

the energy content of the biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF which is not considered zero-rated, and the fossil energy of the fuel streams that are released for consumption and that contain biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF. Please select category A regulated entity or category B regulated entity. Please select biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF. Category of regulated entityThe type of renewable fuel released for consumptionNumber of regulated entitiesEmissions from biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF to which sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are applied and satisfied and emissions from biomass to which no sustainability criteria apply (t CO2(e))Emissions from biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF, SLCF to which the sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria apply but were not satisfied (t CO2(e))Fossil emissions (t CO2(e))Energy content of zero-rated biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF (TJ)Energy content of non-zero rated biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels, RFNBO/RCF or SLCF (TJ)Energy content of fossil fuels/materials (TJ) Which of the methods to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are in general applied in your Member State? Please use the table below providing the response. If national schemes are used to demonstrate such compliance, please describe the main elements. Method allowed to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas savings criteriaYes/NoDescription of main elements if national schemes are usedUnion DatabaseNational database linked with Union Database in accordance with Article 31a of Directive (EU) 2018/2001Voluntary scheme recognised by the Commission National schemeOperator’s own evidence 5.26. Please indicate in the table below the number of category A and B regulated entities that were required to submit and actually submitted an improvement report in accordance with Article 75q of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066. The information in the table below concerns the submission of the improvement report. Please fill in the improvement reports submitted in the previous reporting period and if applicable, please add the number of improvement reports submitted in the current reporting period. Please select: improvement report in accordance with Article 75q(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, improvement report in accordance with Article 75q(3) of that Implementing Regulation or improvement report in accordance with Article 75q(4) of that Implementing Regulation. Regulated entity categoryYearType of improvement reportNumber of regulated entities required to submit an improvement reportNumber of regulated entities that submitted an improvement report in practice 5.E. Shipping companies 5.27. For how many shipping companies and ships was the emission factor for fuels not listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/757 determined in accordance with Articles 32 to 35 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066?

Number of shipping companies that determined the emission factor for fuels not listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/757 in accordance with Articles 32 to 35 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Number of ships for which the emission factor was determined for fuels not listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/757 in accordance with Articles 32 to 35 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 5.28. Which of the methods to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas emission savings criteria are in general applied in your Member State? Please use the table below providing the response. If national schemes are used to demonstrate such compliance, please describe the main elements. Method allowed by competent authority to demonstrate compliance with sustainability criteria or greenhouse gas savings criteriaYes/NoDescription of main elements if national schemes are usedUnion DatabaseNational database linked with Union Database in accordance with Article 31a of Directive (EU) 2018/2001Voluntary scheme recognised by the CommissionNational schemeOperator’s own evidence 6. Arrangements for verification 6.A. General 6.1. Please indicate in the table below the total number of verifiers carrying out verification of stationary installation’s reports Emission reports, baseline data reports, annual activity level reports and new entrant data reports. , aircraft operator’s reports, regulated entity’s reports, or shipping company’s reports, including the assessment of the shipping company’s monitoring plan. For the total number of verifiers from another Member State, please indicate the Member State in which they were accredited by the national accreditation body. Please use additional rows to complete the question for the type of verification. Please select verification of stationary installation’s report, verification of aircraft operator’s reports, verification of regulated entity’s reports or verification of shipping company’s report, including the assessment of the shipping company’s monitoring plan. Total number of verifiers in all ETS verificationsType of verificationNumberMember State of accreditationTotal number of verifiers accredited in your Member StateTotal number of verifiers certified in your Member StateNumber of verifiers accredited by a national accreditation body in another Member State that carried out verification in your Member StateNumber of verifiers certified by a national certification authority in another Member State that carried out verification in your Member State (if relevant) Please indicate in the table below the number of verifiers accredited for a particular scope of accreditation as referred to in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. If Member States have allowed for the certification of natural person verifiers pursuant to Article 55(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067, please indicate also the number of natural person verifiers certified for a particular scope of certification as referred to in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067.

Scope of accreditation or certification listed in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067Number of verifiers accredited in your Member StateNumber of verifiers certified in your Member State 6.2. In the table below, please provide information on the application of the requirements on information exchange specified in Chapter VI of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 or Chapter VI of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917: Please select EU ETS, ETS2 and ETS maritime. Please complete yes/no/partly. And not reported as resolved in previous reports. Information on the application of information exchange requirements specified in Chapter VI of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 or Chapter VI of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917Have all work programmes in accordance with Article 71(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 been submitted?Type of ETS activityFrom the national accreditation body of your Member StateFrom the national accreditation body of another Member StateHave all management reports in accordance with Article 71(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 been submitted?Type of ETS activityFrom the national accreditation body of your Member StateFrom the national accreditation body of another Member StateHave all information exchange reports in accordance with Article 73(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 been submitted?Type of ETS activityTo the national accreditation body of your Member StateTo the national accreditation body of another Member StateNumber of administrative measures imposed on verifiers accredited by your Member StateType of ETS activitySuspensionWithdrawal of accreditationReduction of scopeNumber of administrative measures imposed on verifiers certified by your Member State (if relevant)Type of ETS activitySuspensionWithdrawal of accreditationReduction of scopeNumber of times that the national accreditation body in your Member State has requested the national accreditation body in another Member State to carry out surveillance on its behalf in accordance with Article 50(5) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067Number of complaints made about verifiers accredited by your Member State and the number that have been resolvedNumber of complaints madeNumber of complaints of the left column resolvedNumber of complaints from prior reporting period resolvedIf applicable, the number of complaints made about verifiers certified by your Member State and the number that have been resolvedNumber of complaints madeNumber of complaints of the left column resolvedNumber of complaints from prior reporting period resolved Number of outstanding non-conformities for verifiers reported in the information exchange and the number that have been resolvedNumber of non-conformitiesNumber of non-conformities of the left column resolvedNumber of non-conformities from prior reporting period resolved 6.B. Installations 6.3. For which installations did the competent authority make a conservative estimate of emissions in accordance with Article 70(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please answer using the table below. Add further rows, if necessary.

Installation identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Please specify: no emission report submitted by 31 March; no positive verification opinion statement was given due to material misstatements; no positive verification opinion statement issued owing to a limitation of scope (Article 27(1), point (c), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067); no positive verification opinion statement was given pursuant to Article 27(1), point (d), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067); emission report rejected for non- compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066; or emission report not verified in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Please indicate which of the following actions have been carried out or are being proposed: reminder or formal warning on imposing sanctions sent to operators, blocking of the operator holding account, imposition of fines, or other (please specify). A combination of actions is possible. Installation identification codeYear of emissionsTotal annual emissions of the installation (t CO2(e))Reason for making a conservative estimationEmissions of the installation conservatively estimated (t CO2(e))Method used to conservatively estimate the emissionsFurther action taken or proposed How many installations have received a negative verification opinion statement or have not submitted an emission report by the required deadline? Please specify: no emission report submitted by 31 March, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of material misstatements (Article 27(1), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement was given because of limitation of scope (Article 27(1), point (c), of that Implementing Regulation, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of Article 27(1), point (d), of that Implementing Regulation. Select optionTotal number of installationsFurther comments (if applicable) 6.4. Did any verification report include non-material misstatements, non-conformities that did not lead to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or recommendations for improvement? Yes/No If yes, please provide information in the table below: Please specify: non-material misstatements, non-conformities not leading to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, recommendations for improvement. Main Annex I activityType of issue foundNumber of installationsNumber of issuesNumber of verified emission reports that have led to conservative estimation of the emissions by the competent authority 6.5. Did the competent authority carry out any checks on verified emission reports? Yes/No If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the table below: Please indicate the percentage of checking. Please select: risk-based assessment, % of installations, all category C installations, random selection, or other (if other, please specify).

Checks on the verified emission reports% checked in previous reporting period% checked in the current reporting periodCommentsShare of the emission reports checked for completeness and internal consistency%%Share of the emission reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan%%Share of the emission reports that were cross-checked with allocation data%% Share of the emission reports that were cross-checked with other data Please provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the fourth column %% Share of the emission reports that were analysed in detail Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting emission reports for detailed analysis using the fourth column %%Number of verified emission reports that were rejected because of non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 Number of verified emission reports that were rejected because of other reasons Please indicate the reasons for rejecting the emission reports using the third column Action taken as a result of rejection of verified emission reportsOther action taken as a consequence of checks on verified emission reports 6.6. Have site visits been waived for installations emitting more than 25000 tonnes CO2(e) per year? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of installations for which a site visit was waived under a particular condition. Add further rows, if necessary. Please select the condition(s) as referred to in Article 32 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Condition for waiving site visitMain Annex I activityNumber of installations Were site visits waived for installations with low emissions as referred to in Article 47(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of installations for which a site visit was waived. Total number of site visits waived for installations with low emissions 6.7. Were virtual site visits carried out in accordance with Article 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below: the type of force majeure and the number of installations for which virtual site visits were carried out, whether a competent authority’s approval was obtained or whether a generic authorisation in accordance with Article 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 was applied, and confirmation that conditions for carrying out virtual site visits in accordance with Article 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 were met. Please select approval by competent authority or generic authorisation under Article 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Type of force majeureNumber of installations for which virtual site visits were carried outApproval by competent authority or application of Article 34a(4)Confirmation that Article 34a conditions are met 6.C. Aircraft operators 6.8. For which aircraft operators did the competent authority make a conservative estimation of emissions or non-CO2 aviation effects in accordance with Article 70(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please answer using the table below. Add further rows, if necessary.

Aircraft operator identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Please select: no emission report submitted by 31 March, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of material misstatements, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of limitation of scope (Article 27(1), point (c), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement was given because of Article 27(1), point (d), of that Implementing Regulation, emission report rejected because it was not in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, emission report not verified in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Please indicate which of the following actions have been carried out or are being proposed: reminder or formal warning on imposing sanctions sent to aircraft operators, blocking of the aircraft operator holding account, imposition of fines, or other (please specify). A combination of actions is possible. Aircraft operator identification codeYear of emissions or non-CO2 aviation effectsTotal annual emissions of the aircraft operator (t CO2(e))Total non-CO2 aviation effects of the aircraft operator (tCO2(e))Reason for making a conservative estimationEmissions or non-CO2 aviation effects of the aircraft operator conservatively estimated (t CO2(e))Method used to conservatively estimate the emissionsFurther action taken or proposed How many aircraft operators have received a negative verification opinion statement or have not submitted an emission report by the required deadline? Please select emission report or non-CO2 aviation effects report. Please specify: no emission report submitted by 31 March, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of material misstatements, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of limitation of scope (Article 27(1), point (c), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement was given because of Article 27(1), point (d), of that Implementing Regulation. Type of reportSelect optionTotal number of aircraft operatorsFurther comments, if applicable 6.9. Did any verification report include non-material misstatements, non-conformities that did not lead to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or recommendations for improvement? Yes/No If yes, please provide information in the table below for emissions respectively. Please select: verification of emission report or verification of non-CO2 aviation effects report. Please select: non-material misstatements, non-conformities not leading to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or recommendations for improvement. Type of verificationType of issue foundNumber of aircraft operatorsNumber of issuesNumber of verified emission reports or non-CO2 aviation effects reports that have led to conservative estimation of the emissions by the competent authority

6.10. Did the competent authority carry out any checks on verified emission reports or non-CO2 aviation effects reports? Yes/No If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the tables below for emissions and non-CO2 aviation effects respectively. Table for data related to emission reports Please indicate the percentage of checking. Please select: risk-based assessment, % of aircraft operators, all large aircraft operators, random selection, or other (if other, please specify). Checks on the verified emission reports% checked in the previous reporting period% in the current reporting periodCommentsShare of the emission reports checked for completeness and internal consistency%%Share of the emission reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan%% Share of the emission reports that were cross-checked with other data Please provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the fourth column %% Share of the emission reports that were analysed in detail Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting emission reports for detailed analysis using the fourth column %%Number of verified emission reports rejected because of non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 Number of verified emission reports rejected because of other reasons Please indicate the reasons for rejecting the emission reports using the third column Action taken as a result of rejection of verified emission reportsOther action taken as a consequence of checks on verified emission reports Table for data related to non-CO2 aviation effects reports Please indicate the percentage of checking. Please select: risk-based assessment, % of aircraft operators, all large aircraft operators, random selection, or other (if other, please specify). Checks on the verified non-CO2 aviation effects reports% checked in the previous reporting period% checked in the current reporting periodCommentsShare of the non-CO2 aviation effects reports checked for completeness and internal consistency%%Share of the non-CO2 aviation effects reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan%% Share of the non-CO2 aviation effects reports that were cross-checked with other data Please provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the fourth column %% Share of the non-CO2 aviation effects reports that were analysed in detail Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting non-CO2 aviation effects reports for detailed analysis using the fourth column %%Number of verified non-CO2 aviation effects reports rejected because of non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 Number of verified non-CO2 aviation effects reports rejected because of other reasons Please indicate the reasons for rejecting the non-CO2 aviation effects reports using the third column Action taken as a result of rejection of verified non-CO2 aviation effects reportsOther action taken as a consequence of checks on verified non-CO2 aviation effects reports

6.11. Were site visits waived for small emitters as referred to in Article 55(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of small emitters for which a site visit was waived. Total number of site visits waived for small emitters 6.12. Were virtual site visits carried out in accordance with Article 34a or Article 34b of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below: information on what type of virtual site visit it concerns, for the purposes of Article 34a of that Implementing Regulation, the type of force majeure and the number of aircraft operators for which virtual site visits were carried out, whether a competent authority’s approval was obtained or whether a generic authorisation in accordance with Article 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 was applied, and confirmation that conditions for carrying out virtual site visits in accordance with Article 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 were met. Please select the virtual site visit during emission verification (Article 34a), virtual site visit during emission verification (Article 34b), virtual site visit during non-CO2 effects verification (Article 34a), virtual site visits during non-CO2 effects verification (Article 34b). The type of force majeure only has to be completed in the case of a virtual site visit as referred to in Article 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Please select approval by competent authority or generic authorisation under Article 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Type of virtual site visitType of force majeureNumber of aircraft operators for which virtual site visits were carried outApproval by competent authority or application of Article 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067Confirmation that Article 34a conditions are met 6.D. Regulated entities 6.13. For which regulated entities did the competent authority make a conservative estimation of emissions in accordance with Article 75r(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Please answer using the table below. Add further rows, if necessary. Regulated entity identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Please specify: no emission report submitted by 30 April, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of material misstatements (Article 43r(1), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement was given because of limitation of scope (Article 43r(1), point (c), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement was given because of Article 43r(1), point (d), of that Implementing Regulation, emission report rejected because it was not in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, or emission report not verified in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Please indicate which of the following actions have been carried out or are being proposed: reminder or formal warning on imposing sanctions sent to regulated entities, blocking of the regulated entity holding account, imposition of fines, or other (please specify). A combination of actions is possible.

Regulated entity identification codeYear of emissionsTotal annual emissions of the regulated entity (t CO2(e))Reason for making a conservative estimationEmissions of the regulated entity conservatively estimated (t CO2(e))Method used to conservatively estimate the emissionsFurther action taken or proposed How many regulated entities have received a negative verification opinion statement or have not submitted an emission report by the required deadline? Please specify: no emission report submitted by 30 April, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of material misstatements (Article 43r(1), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement was given because of limitation of scope (Article 43r(1), point (c), of that Implementing Regulation, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of Article 43r(1), point (d), of that Implementing Regulation. Select optionTotal number of regulated entitiesFurther comments, if applicable 6.14. Did any verification report include non-material misstatements, non-conformities that did not lead to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 or recommendations for improvement? Yes/No If yes, please provide information in the table below: Please specify: non-material misstatements, non-conformities not leading to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, recommendations for improvement. Type of issue foundNumber of regulated entitiesNumber of issuesNumber of verified emission reports that have led to conservative estimation of the emissions by the competent authority 6.15. Did the competent authority carry out any checks on verified emission reports? Yes/No If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the table below: Please indicate the percentage of checking. Please select: risk-based assessment, % of regulated entities, all category B regulated entities, random selection, or other (if other, please specify). Checks on the verified emission and verification reports% checked in the previous reporting period% checked in the current reporting periodCommentsShare of the emission reports checked for completeness and internal consistency%%Share of the emission reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan%% Share of the emission reports that were cross-checked with other data Please provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the fourth column %% Share of the emission reports that were analysed in detail Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting emission reports for detailed analysis using the fourth column %%Number of verified emission reports that were rejected because of non-compliance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 Number of verified emission reports that were rejected because of other reasons Please indicate the reasons for rejecting the emission reports using the third column

Action taken as a result of rejection of verified emission reportsOther action taken as a consequence of checks on verified emission reports 6.16. Have site visits been waived for regulated entities? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of regulated entities for which a site visit was waived under a particular condition. Add further rows, if necessary. Please select the condition(s) as referred to in Article 43w of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Condition for waiving site visitNumber of regulated entities Were site visits waived for regulated entities with low emissions as referred to in Article 75n(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of regulated entities for which a site visit was waived. Total number of site visits waived for regulated entities with low emissions 6.17. Were virtual site visits carried out in accordance with Articles 43x and 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below: the type of force majeure and the number of regulated entities for which virtual site visits were carried out, whether a competent authority’s approval was obtained or whether a generic authorisation in accordance with Article 43x and Article 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 was applied, and confirmation that conditions for carrying out virtual site visits in accordance with Articles 43x and 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 were met. Please select approval by competent authority or generic authorisation under Article 43x and 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Type of force majeureNumber of regulated entities for which virtual site visits were carried outApproval by competent authority or application of Article 43x and 34a(4)Confirmation that Article 43x and 34a conditions are met 6.E. Shipping companies 6.18. For which shipping companies did the administering authority make a conservative estimation of emissions in accordance with Article 2 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2849 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2849 of 12 October 2023 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the rules for reporting and submission of the aggregated emissions data at company level (OJ L, 2023/2849, 15.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2849/oj). ? Please answer using the table below. Add further rows, if necessary. Shipping company identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Please specify: no emission report submitted by the required deadline, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of material misstatements, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of limitation of scope, no positive verification opinion statement was given because aggregate or individual non-conformities provide insufficient clarity and prevent the verifier from stating with reasonable assurance that the report is free from material misstatements, emission report rejected because it was not in line with Regulation (EU) 2015/757 or Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1927, or emission report not verified in line with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917.

Please indicate which of the following actions have been carried out or are being proposed: reminder or formal warning on imposing sanctions sent to shipping companies, blocking of the shipping company holding account, imposition of fines, or other (please specify). A combination of actions is possible. Shipping company identification codeYear of emissionsTotal annual emissions of the shipping company (t CO2(e))Reason for making conservative estimationEmissions of the shipping company conservatively estimated (t CO2(e))Method used to conservatively estimate the emissionsFurther action taken or proposed How many shipping companies have received a negative verification conclusion or have not submitted an emission report by the required deadline? Please select the verifier’s assessment of monitoring plans, verification of emission reports, verification of reports at company level. Please specify: no report submitted by the required deadline, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of material misstatements, no positive verification opinion statement was given because of limitation of scope, no positive verification opinion statement was given because aggregate or individual non-conformities provide insufficient clarity and prevent the verifier from stating with reasonable assurance that the report is free from material misstatements, report rejected because it was not in line with Regulation (EU) 2015/757 or Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1927, report not verified in line with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917, non-compliance of the monitoring plan with Regulation (EU) 2015/757 or Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1927. Please fill in the number of shipping companies for the assessment of monitoring plans and verification of reports on company level. Please fill in the number of ships for the verification of emission reports. Type of verificationSelect optionTotal number of ships or shipping companiesFurther comments, if applicable 6.19. Did any verification report related to the different types of verification include non-material misstatements, non-conformities that did not lead to a negative verification opinion statement or recommendations for improvement? Yes/No If yes, please provide information in the table below: Please select emission report or report at shipping company level. Please specify: non-material misstatements, non-conformities not leading to a negative verification opinion statement, recommendations for improvement. Please fill in the number of ships for the verification of emission reports and the number of shipping companies for the verification of reports at shipping company level. Type of verificationType of issue foundNumber of ships or shipping companiesNumber of issuesNumber of verified reports that have led to conservative estimation of the emissions by the administering authority 6.20. Did the administering authority carry out any checks on verified ship’s emission reports or verified reports at company level? Yes/No

If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the table below: Please select emission report or report at shipping company level. Please indicate the percentage of checking. Please select: risk-based assessment, % of ships or shipping companies, large ships or shipping companies, random selection, or other (if other, please specify). Type of reportChecks on the verification reports% checked in the previous reporting period% checked in the current reporting periodCommentsShare of the reports checked for completeness and internal consistency%%Share of the reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan%% Share of the reports that were cross-checked with other data Please provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the fifth column %% Share of the reports that were analysed in detail Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting reports for detailed analysis using the fifth column %%Number of verified reports that were rejected because of non-conformities Number of verified reports that were rejected because of other reasons Please indicate the reasons for rejecting the reports using the fourth column Action taken as a result of rejection of verified reportsOther action taken as a consequence of checks on verified reports 6.21. Please specify in the table below: the number of ships or shipping companies for which site visits were waived for the purpose of assessing the monitoring plan in accordance with Article 6(6) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917, verifying the emission report in accordance with Article 18(7) of that Delegated Regulation or verifying the report at shipping company level in accordance with Article 31(5) of that Delegated Regulation, the number of ships or shipping companies for which virtual site visits were carried out for the purpose of assessing the monitoring plan in accordance with Article 6(5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917, verifying the emission report in accordance with 18(6) of that Delegated Regulation or verifying the report at shipping company level in accordance with Article 31(6) of that Delegated Regulation. Number of shipsNumber of shipping companiesNumber of shipping companies for which site visits were waived for the purposes of assessing the monitoring planNumber of ships for which site visits were waived for the purpose of verifying the emission reportNumber of shipping companies for which site visits were waived for the purpose of verifying the report at shipping company levelNumber of shipping companies for which virtual site visits were carried out by the verifier for the purposes of assessing the monitoring planNumber of ships for which virtual site visits were carried out by the verifier for the purpose of verifying the emission reportNumber of shipping companies for which virtual site visits were carried out by the verifier for the purpose of verifying the report at shipping company level 7. Registries 7.1. Please attach a copy of your Member State specific terms and conditions required to be signed by account holders.

7.2. In all cases where an account was closed because there was no reasonable prospect of further allowances being surrendered by an installation, aircraft operator, regulated entity or shipping company, please describe in the table below why there was no reasonable further prospect and state the amount of outstanding allowances. Add further rows, if necessary. Installation identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Installation / aircraft operator / regulated entity / shipping company identification codeInstallation / aircraft operator / regulated entity / shipping company nameInstallation / aircraft operator / regulated entity / shipping company nameNumber of allowances outstandingReason for no reasonable further prospect 7.3. On how many occasions during the reporting year did aircraft operators use the mandate as provided for in Article 15(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122 of 12 March 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the functioning of the Union Registry (OJ L 177, 2.7.2019, p. 3, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/1122/oj). ? Please specify below the number of occasions. Number of occasions that the mandate was used during the reporting period Which aircraft operators used a mandate during the reporting period as provided for in Article 15(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122? Please provide the information by using the table below. Add further rows, if necessary. Aircraft operator identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Aircraft operator identification codeAircraft operator name 8. Allocation 8.A. General 8.1. Are you using the template developed by the Commission for monitoring methodology plans, baseline data reports, annual activity level reports, climate-neutrality plans, climate-neutrality reports and verification reports? Yes/No If no, please specify in the table below whether you have developed Member State customised electronic templates or specific file formats for monitoring methodology plans, baseline data reports, annual activity level reports, climate-neutrality plans, climate-neutrality reports and verification reports, and indicate what elements are different compared to the template developed by the Commission. Please select Member State specific template or Member State specific file format. Compared to the requirements of the Commission published template and specific file formats. Member State specific template or file formatWhat elements of the template or specific file format are Member State specific?Monitoring methodology planClimate-neutrality planBaseline data reportAnnual activity level reportClimate-neutrality reportVerification report 8.2. Are fees charged to operators in relation to activities pursuant to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842? Yes/No

If yes, please provide details in the table below regarding these fees: Reason for fee/descriptionAmount in euroMonitoring methodology plan approvalClimate-neutrality plan checked on complianceApproval of significant changes to the monitoring methodology planUpdates of climate-neutrality planOther, please specify: 8.3. If Member States are using an IT system, is that system also covering activities pursuant to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842? Yes/No 8.4. Please complete in the table below information on renunciation and suspension of allowances and the recovering of excess allowances as a result from over-allocation: This question has to be answered for the first time in the report due by 30 June 2027. Number of installationsHow many installations have renounced free allocation for all or certain sub-installations under Article 24 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331?For how many installations has the competent authority suspended the issuance of allowances in accordance with Article 3(3), third subparagraph, of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842?For how many installations has the competent authority suspended the issuance of allowances in accordance with Article 3(3) fourth subparagraph of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842?For how many installations has the competent authority recovered excess allowances resulting from over-allocation in accordance with Article 3(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842? 8.5. Were there sub-installations using the fuel benchmark or heat benchmark for which Article 6(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 is applied? This question only has to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2025 and 30 June 2026. Yes/No If yes, please complete in the table below the number of sub-installations concerned: Number of fuel benchmark sub-installations concernedNumber of heat benchmark sub-installations concerned Were there sub-installations for which the competent authority rejected the application of Article 6(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842? Yes/No If yes, please complete in the table below the number of sub-installations: Number of fuel benchmark sub-installations concernedNumber of heat benchmark sub-installations concerned Were there sub-installations using the fuel benchmark or heat benchmark for which Article 6(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 was applied? Yes/No If yes, please complete in the table below the number of sub-installations concerned: Number of fuel benchmark sub-installations concernedNumber of heat benchmark sub-installations concerned 8.6. Please specify the number of installations that were no longer included within the scope of EU ETS during the reporting year: ReasonNumber of installationsCessationReduction of capacity which brings the installation carrying out combustion activities below 20 MWReduction of capacity which brings the installation below a production capacity threshold listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECSale or transfer of part of the installation to another legal entity, which brings the installation below a threshold listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECChange in installation boundaries or permit, which brings the installation below a threshold listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/ECOther reasons for no longer including installations, please specify

8.7. Have you applied Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC? Yes/No If yes, please provide in the table below the total number of emission allowances issued and the total value of investments made in the reporting period. Within the reporting periodTotal number of emission allowances issued under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/ECTotal value of investments under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC 8.B. Baseline data reports Questions 8.8 and 8.9 have to be completed regarding the most recent national implementation measures as referred to in Article 11 of Directive 2003/87/EC 8.8. How many installations received a negative verification opinion statement for the baseline data reports? Please specify: no positive verification opinion statement because of material misstatements (Article 27(1), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement because of limitation of scope (Article 27(1), point (c), of that Implementing Regulation), no positive verification opinion statement because of Article 27(1), point (d), of that Implementing Regulation. Select optionTotal number of installations 8.9. Did any verification report corresponding to the baseline data report include non-material misstatements, non-conformities that did not lead to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 or recommendations for improvement? Yes/No If yes, please provide information in the table below: Please specify: non-material misstatements, non-conformities not leading to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331, recommendations for improvement. Main Annex I activityType of issue foundNumber of installationsNumber of issuesThe number of installations for which the competent authority has determined the historic activity levels in accordance with Article 15(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 because the data gaps leading to the verifier’s opinion were due to exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances that could not have been avoided even if all due care had been exercised. 8.C. Annual activity level reports and climate-neutrality reports 8.10. Did the competent authority require operators to report additional parameters included in Annex IV to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 in accordance with Article 3(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842? Yes/No If yes, please specify the type of additional parameters: Type of additional parameters 8.11. How many installations have received a negative verification opinion statement for an annual activity level report or climate-neutrality report, or have not submitted an annual activity level report or climate-neutrality report by the required deadline? Please specify annual activity level report or climate-neutrality report. Please specify: no annual activity level report submitted by 31 March, no climate-neutrality report submitted by 31 March, no positive verification opinion statement because of material misstatement (Article 27(1), point (b), of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067), no positive verification opinion statement because milestones and targets are not achieved (Article 27(1)(ba) of that Implementing Regulation, no positive verification opinion statement because of limitation of scope (Article 27(1), point (c), of that Implementing Regulation, no positive verification opinion statement because of Article 27(1) (ca) of that Implementing Regulation, no positive verification opinion statement because of Article 27(1), point (d), of that Implementing Regulation.

This column only has to be completed for annual activity level reports. Type of reportSelect optionTotal number of installationsNumber of installations for which conservative estimation of allocation data by the competent authority was carried out 8.12. Did any verification report include non-material misstatements, non-conformities that did not lead to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 or Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 or recommendations for improvement? Yes/No If yes, please provide information in the table below: Please select annual activity level report or climate-neutrality report. Please specify: non-material misstatements, non-conformities not leading to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 or Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2441, recommendations for improvement. Type of reportMain Annex I activityType of issue foundNumber of installationsNumber of issuesNumber of installations for which conservative estimation of allocation data by the competent authority was carried out 8.13. Did the competent authority reject annual activity level reports or climate-neutrality reports? Yes/No If yes, please fill in the table: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2441 of 31 October 2023 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the content and format of climate-neutrality plans needed for granting free allocation of emission allowances (OJ L, 2023/2441, 3.11.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/2441/oj). Rejection of annual activity level reports or climate-neutrality reportAnnual activity level reportClimate-neutrality reportNumber of verified annual activity level reports or climate neutrality reports that were rejected because of non-compliance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842 or Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2441 Number of verified annual activity level reports or climate-neutrality reports that were rejected because of other reasons Please indicate the reasons for rejecting the annual activity level reports or climate-neutrality reports Action taken as a result of rejection of verified annual activity level reportsAction taken as a result of rejection of verified climate-neutrality reportsOther action taken as a consequence of checks on verified annual activity level reportsOther action taken as a consequence of checks on verified climate-neutrality reports 8.14. Have site visits been waived during the verification of annual activity level reports? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of installations for which a site visit was waived under a particular condition. Add further rows, if necessary. Please select the condition as referred to in Article 32 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Condition for waiving site visitNumber of installations

8.15. Have virtual site visits been carried out in accordance with Article 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 during the verification of annual activity level reports or climate-neutrality reports? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below: the type of force majeure and the number of installations for which virtual site visits were carried out, whether competent authority’s approval was obtained or whether a generic authorisation in accordance with Article 34a(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 was applied, and confirmation that conditions for carrying out virtual site visits in accordance with Article 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 were met. Please select the annual activity level report or climate-neutrality report. Please select approval by competent authority or generic authorisation under Article 34a of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Type of reportsType of force majeureNumber of installations for which virtual site visits were carried outApproval by competent authority or application of Article 34a(4)Confirmation that Article 34a conditions are met 8.16. Which penalties apply to infringements of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2441 and national law pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementFines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherMinMaxMinMaxFailure to hold a monitoring methodology plan approved by the competent authorityFailure to monitor and implement procedures in accordance with the approved monitoring methodology plan and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1842Failure to notify changes to the monitoring methodology plan and to update the monitoring methodology plan in accordance with Article 9 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/331Failure to submit an annual activity level report by the required deadlineFailure to submit a climate-neutrality report by the required deadlineFailure to comply with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2441Other, please specify 8.17. Which infringements were incurred and which penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementActual penalties imposed in the reporting period Are there on-going proceedings related to the imposition of the penalty? Yes/No Was the penalty enforced in the same reporting period? Yes/No Fines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherType of infringement should be selected from the list in question 8.16. Every imposed penalty should be reported in a separate line Were penalties imposed in prior reporting periods enforced in the current reporting period? If yes, please complete the table: Please select fines, imprisonment or other. Type of infringementType of penaltyReporting year in which penalty was reported

1. Fees and charges 9.A. Installations and regulated entities 9.1. Are fees charged to operators or regulated entities? Yes/No If yes, please provide details in the table below regarding fees charged for the issuance and update of permits and approval and update of monitoring plans. Reason for fee/descriptionAmount in euro for ETS1Amount in euro for ETS2Permit issuance/ monitoring plan approvalPermit updatePermit transferPermit surrenderNew entrant reserve applicationOther, please specify: If yes, please provide details for the annual subsistence fees using the following table. Reason for fee/descriptionAmount in euro for ETS1Amount in euro for ETS 2Annual subsistence chargeOther, please specify 9.B. Aircraft operators and shipping companies 9.2. Are fees charged to aircraft operators or shipping companies? Yes/No If yes, please provide details in the table below regarding fees charged for the approval and update of monitoring plans. Reason for fee/descriptionAmount in euro for aircraft operatorsAmount in euro for shipping companiesAviation and maritime sectorApproval of monitoring plan for emissionsApproval of change to monitoring plan for emissionsTransfer of monitoring plan for emissionsSurrender of monitoring plan for emissionsOther, please specifyAviation sector onlyApproval of monitoring plan for non-CO2 aviation effects reportsApproval of change to monitoring plan for non-CO2 aviation effects reportsTransfer of monitoring plans for non-CO2 aviation effects reportsSurrender of monitoring plan for non-CO2 aviation effects reports If yes, please provide in the table below details for the annual subsistence fees. Please fill in the data for aviation and ETS maritime, if relevant. Reason for fee/descriptionAmount in euro for aircraft operatorsAmount in euro for shipping companiesAnnual subsistence charge for emissionsAnnual subsistence charge for non-CO2 aviation effects reports of aircraft operatorsOther, please specify 9.C. Installations, aircraft operators, regulated entities or shipping companies 9.3. In the tables below, please specify the one-off and annual fees that are charged to operators, aircraft operators, regulated entities or shipping companies in relation to registry accounts. Table for annual fees Please select operator, aircraft operator, regulated entity, shipping company. Reason for fee/descriptionParty to which fees are chargedAmount in euro Table for annual fees Please select operator, aircraft operator, regulated entity, shipping company. Reason for fee/descriptionParty to which fees are chargedAmount in euroFurther information on national fee structure in national legislation or national websites (if applicable)
2. Issues related to compliance with the EU ETS Directive 10.A. Installations 10.1. In the table below, please specify what measures were taken to ensure that operators complied with the permit and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Add further rows, if necessary.

Measures taken to ensure complianceYes/NoCommentsWere inspections on installations carried out by the competent authority? Please specify the number of on-site inspections under the comments column.Was the selling of emission allowances prohibited in the case of irregularities? Have preventive measures been taken to ensure operator’s compliance? If yes, please specify in the comment box the type of measures Have any recurrent deficiencies been identified as a result of preventive measures and inspection?Other, please specify: 10.2. Which penalties apply to infringements of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 and national law pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementFines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherMinMaxMinMaxOperation without a permitFailure to comply with the conditions of the permitFailure to hold a monitoring plan approved by the competent authorityFailure to submit supporting documentation in accordance with Article 12(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to hold a required sampling plan(s) approved by the competent authorityFailure to monitor and implement procedures in accordance with the approved monitoring plan and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to notify changes to the monitoring plan and to update the monitoring plan in accordance with Articles 14, 15 and 16 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to submit a verified emission report by 31 March or earlier if the competent authority set an earlier deadlineFailure to submit an improvement report(s) in accordance with Article 69 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to provide to the verifier information in accordance with Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067The verified emission report is found not to be in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Excess allowances not returned by the installations despite the return being requested by the competent authorityOther, please specify Which national law was used to specify infringements and penalties? 10.3. Which infringements were incurred and which penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementActual penalties imposed in the reporting period Are there on-going proceedings related to the imposition of the penalty? Yes/No Was the penalty enforced in the same reporting period? Yes/No Fines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherType of infringement should be selected from the list in question 10.2. Every imposed penalty should be reported in a separate line. Were penalties imposed in prior reporting periods enforced in the current reporting period? If yes, please complete the table: Please select fines, imprisonment or other. Type of infringementType of penaltyReporting year in which penalty was reported

10.4. In the table below, please provide the names of operators for which excess emission penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC. Installation identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Installation identification codeName of operator 10.B. Aircraft operators 10.5. In the table below, please specify what measures were taken to ensure that aircraft operators complied with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067. Add further rows, if necessary. Measures takenYes/NoCommentsWere inspections on aircraft operators carried out by the competent authority? Please specify the number of site inspections under the comments column.Was the selling of emission allowances prohibited in the case of irregularities? Were preventive measures taken to ensure aircraft operator’s compliance? If yes, please specify in the comment box the type of measures. Were any recurrent deficiencies identified as a result of preventive measures and inspection?Other, please specify: 10.6. Which penalties apply to infringements of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 and national law pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Please specify under other what CORSIA specific requirements were not complied with. Type of infringementFines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherMinMaxMinMaxFailure to hold a monitoring plan approved by the competent authorityFailure to submit supporting documentation in accordance with Article 12(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to monitor and implement procedures in accordance with the approved monitoring plan and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to notify changes to the monitoring plan and to update the monitoring plan in accordance with Articles 14, 15 and 16 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to correct discrepancies in reporting the completeness of flightsFailure to submit a verified emission report by 31 March or earlier if the competent authority set an earlier deadlineFailure to submit a verified non-CO2 aviation effects report by 31 March or earlier if the competent authority set an earlier deadlineFailure to submit an improvement report(s) in accordance with Article 69 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to provide the verifier information in accordance with Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067The verified emission report is found not to be in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066The verified non-CO2 aviation effects report is found not to be in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 Excess allowances not returned by the aircraft operator despite the return being requested by the competent authorityFailure to comply with CORSIA specific requirementsOther, please specify: In which national law were the infringements and penalties defined?

10.7. Which infringements were found and which penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementActual penalties imposed in the reporting period Are there on-going proceedings related to the imposition of the penalty? Yes/No Was the penalty enforced in the same reporting period? Yes/No Fines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherType of infringement should be selected from the list in question 10.6. Every imposed penalty should be reported in a separate line. Were penalties imposed in prior reporting periods enforced in the current reporting period? If yes, please complete the table below. Please select fines, imprisonment or other. Type of infringementType of penaltyReporting year in which penalty was reported 10.8. In the table below, please provide the names of aircraft operators for which excess emission penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC. Aircraft operator identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Aircraft operator identification codeName of aircraft operator 10.9. What measures would have to be taken in your Member State before requesting an operating ban from the Commission in accordance with Article 16(10) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please specify below the types of measures. 10.C. Regulated entities 10.10. In the table below, please specify what measures were taken to ensure that regulated entities complied with the permit and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 and with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/2067. Add further rows, if necessary. Measures taken to ensure complianceYes/NoCommentsWere inspections on regulated entities carried out by the competent authority? Please specify the number of on-site inspections under the comments column.Was the selling of emission allowances prohibited in the case of irregularities? Have preventive measures been taken to ensure regulated entity’s compliance? If yes, please specify in the comment box the type of measures Have any recurrent deficiencies been identified as a result of preventive measures and inspection?Other, please specify: 10.11. Which penalties apply to infringements of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 and national law pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementFines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherMinMaxMinMaxOperation without a permitFailure to comply with the conditions of the permitFailure to hold a monitoring plan approved by the competent authorityFailure to submit supporting documentation in accordance with Article 75b and Article 12(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to hold a required sampling plan(s) approved by the competent authorityFailure to monitor and implement procedures in accordance with the approved monitoring plan and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066

Failure to notify changes to the monitoring plan and to update the monitoring plan in accordance with Articles 75b and Articles 14, 15 and 16 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to submit a verified emission report by 30 April or earlier if the competent authority set an earlier deadlineFailure to submit an improvement report(s) in accordance with Article 75q of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Failure to provide to the verifier information in accordance with Article 43e of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067The verified emission report is found not to be in line with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066Other, please specify Which national law was used to specify infringements and penalties? 10.12. Which infringements were incurred and which penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementActual penalties imposed in the reporting periodAre there on-going proceedings related to the imposition of the penalty? Yes/NoWas the penalty enforced in the same reporting period? Yes/NoFines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherType of infringement should be selected from the list in question 10.11. Every imposed penalty should be reported in a separate line. Were penalties imposed in prior reporting periods enforced in the current reporting period? If yes, please complete the table: Please select fines, imprisonment or other. Type of infringementType of penaltyReporting year in which penalty was reported 10.13. In the table below, please provide the names of regulated entities for which excess emission penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC. Regulated entity identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Regulated entity identification codeName of regulated entity 10.D. Shipping companies 10.14. In the table below, please specify what measures were taken to ensure that shipping companies complied with Regulation (EU) 2015/757 and with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917. Add further rows, if necessary. Measures takenYes/NoCommentsWere onboard inspections on ships carried out by the administering authority for the assessment of monitoring plans and verification of emission reports? Please specify the number of site inspections under the comments column.Were on-site inspections ashore carried out on shipping companies by the administering authority? Please specify the number of site inspections under the comments column.Was the selling of emission allowances prohibited in the case of irregularities? Were preventive measures taken to ensure shipping company’s compliance? If yes, please specify in the comment box the type of measures. Were any recurrent deficiencies identified as a result of preventive measures and inspection?Other, please specify: 10.15. Which penalties apply to infringements of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917 and national law pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary.

Type of infringementFines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherMinMaxMinMaxFailure to hold a monitoring plan approved by the competent authorityFailure to submit supporting documentation to the monitoring plan in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2015/757 or failure to submit those plans in timeFailure to monitor and implement procedures in accordance with the approved monitoring plan and Regulation (EU) 2015/757Failure to notify changes to the monitoring plan and to update the monitoring plan in accordance with Articles 7 of Regulation (EU) 2015/757Failure to submit a verified partial emission report by the required deadlineFailure to submit a verified emission report and obtaining a valid document of compliance by the required deadlineFailure to submit a verified report at shipping company level by the required deadlineFailure to provide the verifier information in accordance with Article 4 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917Failure to provide the verifier information in accordance with Article 10 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917Failure to provide the verifier information in accordance with Article 24 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2917The verified emission report is found not to be in line with Regulation (EU) 2015/757Failure to request the opening of a Maritime Operator Holding Account by the required deadlineFailure to surrender sufficient allowancesFailure to notify the national administrator in the case of changes to the ships for which it has assumed responsibility for monitoring and reporting emissions under the EU ETS maritime within the applicable deadlinesOther, please specify: In which national law were the infringements and penalties defined? 10.16. Which infringements were found and which penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC? Please complete the table and add further rows, if necessary. Type of infringementActual penalties imposed in the reporting periodAre there on-going proceedings related to the imposition of the penalty? Yes/NoWas the penalty enforced in the same reporting period? Yes/NoFines in euroImprisonment in monthsOtherType of infringement should be selected from the list in question 10.15. Every imposed penalty should be reported in a separate line. Were penalties imposed in prior reporting periods enforced in the current reporting period? If yes, please complete the table below. Please select fines, imprisonment or other. Type of infringementType of penaltyReporting year in which penalty was reported 10.17. In the table below, please provide the names of shipping companies for which excess emission penalties were imposed during the reporting period pursuant to Article 16(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC. Shipping company identification code recognised in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. Shipping company identification codeName of shipping company 11. The legal nature of allowances and fiscal treatment 11.1. What is the legal nature of an allowance in your Member State?

11.2. What is the financial accounting treatment of emission allowances in your Member State? 11.3. Is VAT due on the issuance of and transactions in emission allowances? Yes/No If yes, does your Member State apply the reverse-charge mechanism? Yes/No 11.4. Are emission allowances taxed? Yes/No If yes, please indicate in the table below the type of tax and tax rates that apply. Add further rows, if necessary. Type of taxTax rate applied 12. Fraud 12.1. In the table below, please specify what arrangements are in place concerning fraudulent activities related to the free allocation of allowances. Arrangements concerning fraudulent activitiesDetails of arrangements and procedures in national lawAre procedures or processes in place for operators, aircraft operators or third parties to raise concerns over potentially fraudulent activity regarding the free allocation of allowances? If yes, please specify what procedures.Does the same legislation regulate fraudulent activities related to free allocation of allowances as other types of fraud? If no, please indicate the relevant legislation.What authorities are responsible for the investigation of fraud regarding free allocation of allowances? Do the same procedures apply to the investigation of fraud regarding free allocation of allowances in EU ETS as other types of fraud in your Member State? Yes/No If no, please describe the procedures and the role of the EU ETS competent authority in those procedures. Do the same procedures apply to the prosecution of fraud regarding free allocation of allowances in EU ETS as other types of fraud in your Member State? Yes/No If no, please describe the procedures and the role of the EU ETS competent authority in those procedures. In the event of prosecution for fraudulent activities, what are the maximum penalties? Please describe fines and imprisonment terms. 12.2. In the table below, please specify what arrangements are in place to ensure that competent authorities involved in the implementation of EU ETS for activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC and ETS for buildings, road transport and additional activities covered by Chapter IVa of that Directive are made aware of fraudulent activities If the response for the emission trading system for buildings, road transport and additional activities covered by Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC or the maritime transport activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC is different compared to the EU ETS for industry or aviation, please state so. . If there are difference between EU ETS for installations and aviation, ETS2 for regulated entities and EU ETS for maritime transport activities please specify these differences. Arrangements concerning the communication of fraudulent activities to the competent authorityDetails of arrangements and proceduresIs the competent authority under EU ETS1 or ETS2 informed when authorities responsible for the investigation and prosecution of fraud carried out an investigation on fraudulent activities of an operator, aircraft operator, regulated entity or shipping company? If yes, please specify how.Is the competent authority informed of cases on fraudulent activities brought to court? If yes, please specify how.Is the competent authority informed of cases on fraudulent activities settled out of court? If yes, please specify how.Is the competent authority informed the verdict of the court cases on fraudulent activities? If yes, please specify how.

12.3. In the table below, please indicate the following information on fraudulent activities as far as it is known to the competent authority involved in your Member State in the implementation of EU ETS for activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC and the ETS for buildings road transport and additional activities covered by Chapter IVa of that Directive: the number of investigations carried out in the reporting period (including ongoing), the number of cases brought to court in the reporting period, the number of cases settled out of court without conviction and the number of cases leading to acquittal in the reporting period, and the number of cases in the reporting period leading to a conviction that a fraudulent activity was committed. Information concerning fraudulent activitiesNumber ETS1Number ETS2Number ETS maritimeNumber of investigations carried outNumber of cases brought to court Number of cases settled out of court without conviction and the number of cases leading to acquittalNumber of cases leading to a conviction that a fraudulent activity has been committed 13. Other observations 13.1. In the table below, please provide details of any other issues that give rise to concerns in your Member State, or any other relevant information you would like to provide. SectionOther information or issues of concernGeneralSection 2Section 3Section 4Section 5Section 6Section 7Section 8Section 9Section 10Section 11Section 12 13.2. Have you addressed all questions in this questionnaire and updated the responses to those questions where relevant? Yes/No If no, please return to the question concerned.